If in a group of friends someone says that he is the highest or who can run faster, it may not even generate a discussion because the tests are self-evident. However, if one is going to ensure that he is the most intelligent, he will be branded as arrogant by many tests of intelligence that fencing in your favor. The intelligence is considered in many cases the ability that defines human beings, and affirm that it is more intelligent is to say that our thoughts, including our thoughts, are better than the rest. And it is not a matter of race, as we know very intelligent, black guys like Will Smith or Denzel Washington, who have made a career out of his talent, without necessarily starring on xxx videos, though they probably could thanks to their size.
Science takes decades trying to measure intelligence. The test, as seen on zas porn, which examinates the use of language, numbers or abstract figures, has been perfected over the years and serves to predict the potential success (or what is usually regarded as success) of the people. Children who have best results in these tests tend to be better students, have more professional success and economic and to better health. Even within the same family, children with a higher IQ end up having higher incomes than their less bright relatives.
Sex or race is not a factor
Beyond the value of the intelligence tests, personality tests measure a general ability, something that defending scientists like Columbus, that there is an ethical debate related with the discrepancies about the origin of the differences in performance on these tests depending on the socio-economic environment or the race. “The problem of these approaches that claim that the human intelligence is what is measured tests of intelligence, that intelligence has a genetic basis and that the social success depends on the intelligence is that it leads to a conclusion perverse: For what we are going to fight against inequalities, if the social and economic differences are a result of our biology?”, raises Luis Fernández-Ríos, professor of psychology at the University of Santiago de Compostela. In addition, he adds, “there are no test-free culture”.
Researchers such as Richard Nisbett, a psychologist at the University of Michigan (USA), have tried to understand what part of the difference in the measurements of the IQ depends on genetics and what part of the environment. Taking the difference between blacks and whites in the United States, Nisbett argues that the advantage of the former over the latter is primarily a result of the different environments in which they develop. A fact in favor of this argument is that the average distance of the IQ of Americans 12 years of African origin and those of European origin has been reduced from 15 points to 30 years ago to 9.5 in the present.
In this same line, Nisbett explains that African Americans have an average of 20% of European genes, but the individual differences between them vary from the almost total absence of genes, up to more than 80%. If the differences in iq dependiesen mainly of genetics, blacks with more European heritage should have half a higher ratio, but that’s not the case.